Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: "Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review | Jagosh et al. Implementation Science 2011 6 24 http www.implementationscience.eom content 6 1 24 IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE Implementation Science STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Assessing the outcomes of participatory research protocol for identifying selecting appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review 1 1 1 1 11 1 Justin Jagosh Pierre Pluye Ann C Macaulay Jon Salsberg Jim Henderson Erin Sirett Paula L Bush D Cl k c I I r 1 c- f ĩ ì z t p s I 1 p.3 ft ỉ -X tert s ZZI z 4 V r I D I_I r f 5C r c I iz-x r6 nn I Robbyn Seller Geoff Wong Trish Greenhalgh Margaret Cargo Carol P Herbert Sarena D Seifer and Lawrence W Green7 Abstract Background Participatory Research PR entails the co-governance of research by academic researchers and endusers. End-users are those who are affected by issues under study e.g. community groups or populations affected by illness or those positioned to act on the knowledge generated by research e.g. clinicians community leaders health managers patients and policy makers . Systematic reviews assessing the generalizable benefits of PR must address the diversity of research topics methods and intervention designs that involve a PR approach varying degrees of end-user involvement in research co-governance both within and between projects and the complexity of outcomes arising from long-term partnerships. Methods We addressed the above mentioned challenges by adapting realist review methodology to PR assessment specifically by developing inductively-driven identification selection appraisal and synthesis procedures. This approach allowed us to address the non-uniformity and complexity of the PR literature. Each stage of the review involved two independent reviewers and followed a reproducible systematic coding and retention procedure. Retained studies were completed participatory health interventions demonstrated high levels of participation by non-academic stakeholders i.e. excluding studies in which end-users were not involved in .