Tham khảo tài liệu 'advances in human robot interaction part 9', kỹ thuật - công nghệ, cơ khí - chế tạo máy phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | A Quantitative Evaluation Method of Handedness Using Haptic Virtual Reality Technology 189 Fig. 11. Handedness The tendency of force test was a little different from the other two tests. The reason for this difference should be studied in the future. This chapter has been written based on paper A Quantitative Evaluation Method of Handedness Using Haptic Virtual Reality Technology that was presented at the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot Human Interactive Communication IEEE RO-MAN 2007 Jeju Korea August 2007 . 6. References Bagesteiro . Sainburg . 2002 . Handedness Dominant Arm Advantages in Control of Limb Dynamics Journal of Neurophysiology Burdea . 1996 . Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality A Wiley-Interscience Publication JohnWiley Sons Inc. Fujiwara N. Kushida N. Murakami T. Fujimoto S. 2003 . Upper Limb Coordination Differs Among Ages and Between Dominant and Non-dominant Hands Utilizing Digital Trace Test Journal of health sciences Hiroshima University in Japanese Matsuda I. Yamaguchi M. Yoshida K. 1986 . Quantitative Discrimination of Handedness - Preliminary Study Using Discriminant Analysis Approach - Sagyouryouhou Journal published by Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists in Japanese Oldfield . 1971 . The Assessment and Analysis of Handedness The Edinburgh Inventory Neuropsychologia Wu J. Morimoto K. Kurokawa T. 1996 . A Comparison between Effect of Handedness and Non-handedness on Touch Screen Operation Transactions of Human Interface Society in Japanese 190 Advances in Human-Robot Interaction Yoshikawa T. Yokokohji Y. Matsumoto T. Zheng X-Z. 1995 . Display of Feel for the Manipulation of Dynamic Virtual Objects Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control Yoshikawa T. Yoshimoto K. 2000 . Haptic Simulation of Assembly Operation in Virtual Environment Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic
