Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học quốc tế cung cấp cho các bạn kiến thức về ngành y đề tài: Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? a systematic review | BioMed Central Implementation Science Open Access Systematic Review Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour a systematic review Susan Hrisos 1 Martin P Eccles1 Jill J Francis2 Heather O Dickinson1 Eileen FS Kaner1 Fiona Beyer1 and Marie Johnston3 Address institute of Health and Society Newcastle University 21 Claremont Place Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA UK 2Health Services Research Unit University of Aberdeen Health Sciences Building Foresterhill Aberdeen AB25 2ZD UK and 3Department of Psychology University of Aberdeen Health Sciences Building Foresterhill Aberdeen AB25 2ZD UK Email Susan Hrisos - Martin P Eccles - Jill J Francis - Heather O Dickinson - Eileen FS Kaner - Fiona Beyer - Marie Johnston - Corresponding author Published 3 July 2009 Received 14 January 2009 Implementation Science 2009 4 37 doi 1748-5908-4-37 Accepted 3 July 2009 This article is available from http content 4 1 37 2009 Hrisos et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Accurate measures of health professionals clinical practice are critically important to guide health policy decisions as well as for professional self-evaluation and for research-based investigation of clinical practice and process of care. It is often not feasible or ethical to measure behaviour through direct observation and rigorous behavioural measures are difficult and costly to use. The aim of this review was to identify the current evidence relating to the relationships between proxy measures and direct measures of clinical behaviour. In .
