Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: readiness to change assessment (ORCA): Development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework | BioMed Central Implementation Science Research article Open Access Organizational readiness to change assessment ORCA Development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services PARIHS framework Christian D Helfrich 11 2 Yu-Fang Lit1 3 Nancy D Sharp11 2 and Anne E Sales14 Address 1Northwest HSR D Center of Excellence VA Puget Sound Healthcare System Seattle Washington USA 2Department of Health Services University of Washington School of Public Health Seattle Washington USA 3Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems University of Washington School of Nursing Seattle Washington USA and 4Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada Email Christian D Helfrich - Yu-Fang Li - Nancy D Sharp - Anne E Sales - Corresponding author tEqual contributors Published 14 July 2009 Received 29 August 2008 Implementation Science 2009 4 38 doi 1748-5908-4-38 Accepted I4 July 2009 This article is available from http content 4 1 38 2009 Helfrich et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services or PARIHS framework is a theoretical framework widely promoted as a guide to implement evidence-based clinical practices. However it has as yet no pool of validated measurement instruments that operationalize the constructs defined in the framework. The present article introduces an Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment instrument ORCA organized according to the core elements and sub-elements of the PARIHS framework and reports on initial validation. Methods We conducted scale
