Trong chương này, các quan sát về vai trò của GIS như một công cụ hỗ trợ tái thiết khu vực đô thị được trình bày và tiêu chí cụ thể được cung cấp cho việc đánh giá của PPGIS. Đến nay, PPGIS dự án đã được hạn chế bởi nguồn lực hạn chế, các tổ chức địa phương nhỏ với đội ngũ nhân viên không chuyên nghiệp và các ban, 'khoảng cách' giữa các tổ chức cơ sở và các lĩnh vực chính phủ và kinh doanh, và chính trị, sự khác biệt cơ bản trong số nhiều người. | Chapter 26 A model for evaluating public participation GIS Michael Barndt INTRODUCTION In this chapter observations about the role of GIS as a tool supporting urban neighbourhood revitalization are presented and specific criteria are offered for the evaluation of PPGIS. To date PPGIS projects have been restricted by limited resources small local organizations with non-profes-sional staffs and boards a distance between grassroots organizations and government and business sectors and fundamental political differences among many players. Opportunities for GIS tools to overcome these limitations are often overstated. A number of models have emerged over the last decade for community information and research incorporating GIS. The Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Data Center programme began as an independent entrepreneurial model. Most of the initial funding came from community clients. Much community information experience has been episodic impacting communities for only short periods of time and in fairly limited ways. Few efforts have been comprehensive. Some programmes have organized detailed information but played a limited role in assuring that the data are used. Other programmes have stressed service but have struggled with access and resources to improve information systems. Many programmes have been sector specific and limited to housing health education or environmental concerns. It is necessary to frame critical evaluation questions and criteria that may be used to critique and refine existing PPGIS programmes. For example how do we assess the programmes What expressions of broader objectives for community change might guide the way we use this tool in the service of community In this chapter three basic contexts for evaluation are proposed 1 understanding and the value of PPGIS project results 2 management of PPGIS projects and 3 PPGIS and community development principles. 2002 Taylor Francis A model for evaluating PPGIS 347 I will review topics within .
