Rather, we seek to develop a computational model of design critiquing in which to articulate and describe design critiquing. The test of this research is the model’s ability to represent and implement alternative critiquing strategies by selecting of critiquing methods. Certainly, this computational framework can be evaluated: we plan a three-phase evaluation to test our computational model of design critiquing. In Phase 1, we plan to test whether the program can represent a wide range of proposed critiquing strategies. In Phase 2, we will test if the program can represent real critiquing sessions. In Phase 3, finally we can test if our system can support students’ learning. Here,.
