In Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law, Mark Drumbl rethinks how per- petrators of atrocity crimes should be punished. After first reviewing the sentencing practices of courts and tribunals that censure genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, he concludes that these practices fall short of the goals that interna- tional criminal law ascribes to punishment, in particular retribution and deterrence. This raises the question whether international prosecutorial and correctional prefer- ences are as effective as we hope. Drumbl argues that the pursuit of accountability for extraordinary atrocity crimes should not uncritically adopt the methods and assumptions of ordinary liberal criminal law. He calls for fresh thinking to confront the.
