Lecture Investments (Special Indian Edition): Chapter 8 - Bodie, Kane, Marcus

This chapter contains additional material on the “art” of selecting reasonable parameter values for portfolio construction, and a discussion of what can go wrong when inputs are derived solely from recent historical experience. | Chapter 8 Optimal Risky Portfolios Risk Reduction with Diversification Number of Securities St. Deviation Market Risk Unique Risk rp = W1r1 + W2r2 W1 = Proportion of funds in Security 1 W2 = Proportion of funds in Security 2 r1 = Expected return on Security 1 r2 = Expected return on Security 2 Two-Security Portfolio: Return p2 = w12 12 + w22 22 + 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2) 12 = Variance of Security 1 22 = Variance of Security 2 Cov(r1r2) = Covariance of returns for Security 1 and Security 2 Two-Security Portfolio: Risk 1,2 = Correlation coefficient of returns Cov(r1r2) = 1,2 1 2 1 = Standard deviation of returns for Security 1 2 = Standard deviation of returns for Security 2 Covariance Range of values for 1,2 + > r > If r= , the securities would be perfectly positively correlated If r= - , the securities would be perfectly negatively correlated Correlation Coefficients: Possible Values 2p = W12 12 + W22 12 + 2W1W2 rp = W1r1 + W2r2 + W3r3 Cov(r1r2) + W32 32 Cov(r1r3) + 2W1W3 Cov(r2r3) + 2W2W3 Three-Security Portfolio rp = Weighted average of the n securities p2 = (Consider all pairwise covariance measures) In General, For An N-Security Portfolio: E(rp) = W1r1 + W2r2 p2 = w12 12 + w22 22 + 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2) p = [w12 12 + w22 22 + 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2)]1/2 Two-Security Portfolio Portfolios with Different Correlations = 1 13% %8 E(r) St. Dev 12% 20% = .3 = -1 = -1 The relationship depends on correlation coefficient. < < + The smaller the correlation, the greater the risk reduction potential. If r = +, no risk reduction is possible. Correlation Effects 1 1 2 r22 - Cov(r1r2) W1 = + - 2Cov(r1r2) W2 = (1 - W1) s2 2 E(r2) = .14 = .20 Sec 2 12 = .2 E(r1) = .10 = .15 Sec 1 s 2 Minimum-Variance Combination W1 = (.2)2 - (.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)2 + (.2)2 - 2(.2)(.15)(.2) W1 = .6733 W2 = (1 - .6733) = .3267 Minimum-Variance Combination: = .2 rp = .6733(.10) + .3267(.14) = .1131 p = [(.6733)2(.15)2 + (.3267)2(.2)2 + 2(.6733)(.3267)(.2)(.15)(.2)] 1/2 p = [.0171] 1/2 = .1308 s Risk and Return: Minimum Variance W1 = (.2)2 - (.2)(.15)(.2) (.15)2 + (.2)2 - 2(.2)(.15)() W1 = .6087 W2 = (1 - .6087) = .3913 Minimum - Variance Combination: = rp = .6087(.10) + .3913(.14) = .1157 p = [(.6087)2(.15)2 + (.3913)2(.2)2 + 2(.6087)(.3913)(.2)(.15)()] 1/2 p = [.0102] 1/2 = .1009 s s Risk and Return: Minimum Variance The optimal combinations result in lowest level of risk for a given return. The optimal trade-off is described as the efficient frontier. These portfolios are dominant. Extending Concepts to All Securities Minimum-Variance Frontier of Risky Assets E(r) Efficient frontier Global minimum variance portfolio Minimum variance frontier Individual assets St. Dev. The optimal combination becomes linear. A single combination of risky and riskless assets will dominate. Extending to Include Riskless Asset Alternative CALs M E(r) CAL (Global minimum variance) CAL (A) CAL (P) P A F P P&F A&F M A G P M Portfolio Selection & Risk Aversion E(r) Efficient frontier of risky assets More risk-averse investor U’’’ U’’ U’ Q P S St. Dev Less risk-averse investor Efficient Frontier with Lending & Borrowing E(r) F rf A P Q B CAL St. Dev

Không thể tạo bản xem trước, hãy bấm tải xuống
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TÀI LIỆU MỚI ĐĂNG
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.