On duality for nonsmooth lipschitz optimization problems

We present some duality theorems for a non-smooth Lipschitz vector optimization problem. Under generalized invexity assumptions on the functions the duality theorems do not require constraint qualifications. | Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research Vol 19 (2009), Number 1, 41-47 DOI: ON DUALITY FOR NONSMOOTH LIPSCHITZ OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS Vasile PREDA University of Bucharest, Bucharest preda@ Miruna BELDIMAN Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest Anton BĂTĂTORESCU University of Bucharest, Bucharest Received: December 2007 / Accepted: June 2009 Abstract: We present some duality theorems for a non-smooth Lipschitz vector optimization problem. Under generalized invexity assumptions on the functions the duality theorems do not require constraint qualifications. Keywords: Nonsmooth Lipschitz vector optimization, Fritz John type necessary optimization conditions, duality theorems. 1. INTRODUCTION We shall introduce some definitions used in this article and formulate a vector optimization problem together with its Mond-Weir dual. The real n-dimensional vector space will be denoted by R n and we will use the following conventions for any two vectors x, y ∈ R n : x 0 such that for any y, z ∈ N ( x ) we have ϕ ( y) − ϕ ( z) ≤ K x y − z . Definition (Clarke [1]) The generalized directional derivative of a local Lipschitz function ϕ at x in the direction d is denoted by ϕ o ( x; d ) = lim sup y→ x t 20 ϕ ( y + td ) − ϕ ( y ) t . Definition The Clarke generalized subgradient of a locally Lipschitz function ϕ at x is denoted by ∂ cϕ ( x) = {ξ ∈ X ∗ | ϕ o ( x; d ) ≥ ξ , d , ∀d ∈ X } . Definition (see also Giorgi and Guerraggio [2]) Let us consider: η : X × X → X , ρ ∈ R, d : X × X → R + . We say that: ϕ is (η , ρ ) -pseudoinvex if for ∀x, y ∈ X , ϕ o ( x;η ( y, x )) ≥ ρ d ( y, x) ⇒ ϕ ( y ) ≥ ϕ ( x), or, equivalently, for ∀x, y ∈ X , ∀ξ ∈ ∂ cϕ ( x ), ϕ ( y ) ϕ ( x), V. Preda, M. Beldiman, / On Duality for Nonsmooth Lipschitz 43 or, equivalently, for ∀x, y ∈ X , with x ≠ y , and ∀ξ ∈ ∂ cϕ ( x ) , ϕ ( y ) ≤ ϕ ( x) ⇒ ξ ,η ( y, x) 0} . From () we have g j .

Không thể tạo bản xem trước, hãy bấm tải xuống
TÀI LIỆU MỚI ĐĂNG
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.