Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care cung cấp cho các bạn kiến thức về ngành y đề tài: A comparison of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. | Available online http content 10 2 R49 Research A comparison of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema a meta-analysis Kwok M Ho1 2 and Karen Wong1 Department of Intensive Care Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia 2School of Population Health and Medicine and Pharmacology University of Western Australia Crawley Perth Western Australia Australia Corresponding author Kwok M Ho Received 3 Feb 2006 Revisions requested 17 Feb 2006 Revisions received 21 Feb 2006 Accepted 22 Feb 2006 Published 27 Mar 2006 Critical Care 2006 10 R49 doi cc4861 This article is online at http content 10 2 R49 2006 Ho et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Open Access Abstract Introduction We conducted the present study to investigate the potential beneficial and adverse effects of continuous positive airway pressure CPAP compared with bi-level positive airway pressure BiPAP noninvasive ventilation in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Method We included randomized controlled studies comparing CPAP and BiPAP treatment in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 2005 issue 3 and EMBASE and MEDLINE databases 1966 to 1 December 2005 without language restriction. Two reviewers reviewed the quality of the studies and independently performed data extraction. Results Seven randomized controlled studies including a total of 290 patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema were considered. The hospital mortality relative risk RR 95 confidence interval CI P I2 0 and risk for requiring invasive ventilation RR .
