Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài: Changes in sedation management in German intensive care units between 2002 and 2006: a national follow-up survey. | Available online http content 11 6 R124 Research Changes in sedation management in German intensive care units between 2002 and 2006 a national follow-up survey Jorg Martin1 Martin Franck2 Stefan Sigel1 Manfred Weiss3 and Claudia Spies2 Department of Anesthesiology Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy Hospital am Eichert EichertstraBe 3 73035 Goppingen Germany department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte Chariteplatz 1 10117 Berlin Germany department of Anesthesiology Universitatsklinikum Ulm SteinhovelstraBe 9 89075 Ulm Germany Corresponding author Jorg Martin Received 27 Sep 2007 Revisions requested 5 Nov 2007 Revisions received 18 Nov 2007 Accepted 6 Dec 2007 Published 6 Dec 2007 Critical Care 2007 11 R124 doi cc6189 This article is online at http content 11 6 R1 24 2007 Martin et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Open Access Abstract Background The aim of this study conducted in 2006 was to find out whether changes in sedation management in German intensive care units took place in comparison with our survey from 2002. Methods We conducted a follow-up survey with a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional multi-center design. A postal survey was sent between January and May 2006 up to four times to the same 269 hospitals that participated in our first survey in 2002. The same questionnaire as in 2002 was used with a few additional questions. Results Two hundred fourteen 82 hospitals replied. Sixtyseven percent of the hospitals carried out changes in sedation management since the 2002 survey. Reasons for changes were published literature 46 national guidelines 29 and scientific .
