Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài:Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff. | Available online http content 1 2 6 R148 Research Electronic patient record use during ward rounds a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff Cecily Morrison1 Matthew Jones2 Alan Blackwell1 and Alain Vuylsteke3 Open Access Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge 15 JJ Thompson Avenue Cambridge CB3 0FD UK 2Judge Business School University of Cambridge Trumpington Street Cambridge CB2 1AG UK 3Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge CB23 3RE UK Corresponding author Alain Vuylsteke Received 2 Sep 2008 Revisions requested 23 Sep 2008 Revisions received 13 Oct 2008 Accepted 24 Nov 2008 Published 24 Nov 2008 Critical Care 2008 12 R148 doi cc7134 This article is online at http content 12 6 R1 48 2008 Morrison et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Introduction Electronic patient records are becoming more common in critical care. As their design and implementation are optimized for single users rather than for groups we aimed to understand the differences in interaction between members of a multidisciplinary team during ward rounds using an electronic as opposed to paper patient medical record. Methods A qualitative study of morning ward rounds of an intensive care unit that triangulates data from video-based interaction analysis observation and interviews. Results Our analysis demonstrates several difficulties the ward round team faced when interacting with each other using the electronic record compared with the paper one. The physical setup of the technology may impede the consultant s ability to lead the ward round and may prevent other clinical staff from contributing to discussions. Conclusions We discuss .
