Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài: Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. | Available online http content 13 3 R73 Research Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring Sophie Marque1 2 Alain Cariou1 2 Jean-Daniel Chiche1 2 and Pierre Squara3 1Medical Intensive Care Unit Cochin Hospital 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques 75679 Paris Cedex 1 4 France 2Paris Descartes University Medical School 15 rue de l Ecole de Médecine 75270 Paris Cedex 06 France 3Clinique Ambroise Pare 27 bd Victor Hugo 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine France Corresponding author Pierre Squara Received 19 Dec 2008 Revisions requested 2 Mar 2009 Revisions received 7 Apr 2009 Accepted 19 May 2009 Published 19 May 2009 Critical Care 2009 13 R73 doi cc7884 This article is online at http content 13 3 R73 2009 Marque et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Open Access Abstract Introduction This study was designed to compare the clinical acceptability of two cardiac output CO monitoring systems a pulse wave contour-based system FloTrac-Vigileo and a bioreactance-based system NICOM using continuous thermodilution PAC-CCO as a reference method. Methods Consecutive patients requiring PAC-CCO monitoring following cardiac surgery were also monitored by the two other devices. CO values obtained simultaneously by the three systems were recorded continuously on a minute-by-minute basis. Results Continuous recording was performed on 29 patients providing 12 099 simultaneous measurements for each device 417 107 per patient . In stable conditions correlations of NICOM and Vigileo with PAC-CCO were and respectively. The bias was for NICOM and for Vigileo NS . NICOM relative error was less .
