xác định giá và sự đổ tội bằng cách xem xét sự khác biệt trong những động cơ nằm phía sau hành động của các bên trên thị trường. Khẳng định rằng đã được chỉ định là sai lầm trong những nhận xét trước trong ít nhất không làm giảm công đức to lớn của công việc của họ: | Problem of the Subjective Theory of Value 193 that neither Menger nor Bohm-Bawerk allowed themselves to be misled in any way in the development of their theory of price determination and imputation by consideration for the differences in the motives that lie behind the action of the parties on the market. The assertions that were designated as erroneous in the preceding remarks did not in the least detract from the great merit of their work to explain the determination of prices in terms of the subjective theory of value. 6 The Psychological Basis of the Opposition to Economic Theory Introduction Subjectivist economics would be guilty of an omission if it did not also concern itself with the objections that have been raised against it from political and factional standpoints. There is first of all the assertion that the subjective theory of value is the class ideology of the bourgeoisie. For Hilferding it is bourgeois economics final answer to socialism. 1 Bucharin stigmatizes it as the ideology of the bourgeoisie which even now no longer corresponds to the process of production. 2 One is free to think what one will about these two authors but it is to be noted that they belong to the ruling groups of the two most populous states in Europe and are therefore very capable of influencing public opinion. The millions of people who come into contact with no other writings than those distributed by the Marxist propaganda machine learn nothing of modern economics beyond these and similar condemnations. Then we must consider the views of those who believe it to be significant that subjectivist economics is deliberately not taught at First published in 1931 in Probleme der Wertlehre Part I. 1Cf. Rudolf Hilferding Bohm-Bawerk s Marx-Kritik Marx-Studien Vienna 1904 I p. 61. 2Cf. Nikolai Bucharin Die politische Okonomie des Rentners Berlin 1926 p. 27. .
