Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks | Wilson et al. Implementation Science 2010 5 91 http content 5 1 91 Implementation Science IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Open Access Disseminating research findings what should researchers do A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks Paul M Wilson1 Mark Petticrew2 Mike W Calnan3 Irwin Nazareth4 Abstract Background Addressing deficiencies in the dissemination and transfer of research-based knowledge into routine clinical practice is high on the policy agenda both in the UK and internationally. However there is lack of clarity between funding agencies as to what represents dissemination. Moreover the expectations and guidance provided to researchers vary from one agency to another. Against this background we performed a systematic scoping to identify and describe any conceptual organising frameworks that could be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activity. Methods We searched twelve electronic databases including MEDLINE EMBASE CINAHL and PsycINFO the reference lists of included studies and of individual funding agency websites to identify potential studies for inclusion. To be included papers had to present an explicit framework or plan either designed for use by researchers or that could be used to guide dissemination activity. Papers which mentioned dissemination but did not provide any detail in the context of a wider knowledge translation framework were excluded. References were screened independently by at least two reviewers disagreements were resolved by discussion. For each included paper the source the date of publication a description of the main elements of the framework and whether there was any implicit explicit reference to theory were extracted. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results Thirty-three frameworks met our inclusion criteria 20 of which were designed to be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activities. Twenty-eight included frameworks were underpinned at .
