Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review | Jagosh et al. Implementation Science 2011 6 24 http content 6 1 24 IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE Implementation Science STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Assessing the outcomes of participatory research protocol for identifying selecting appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review 1 1 1 1 11 1 Justin Jagosh Pierre Pluye Ann C Macaulay Jon Salsberg Jim Henderson Erin Sirett Paula L Bush D Cl k c I I r 1 c- f ĩ ì z t p s I 1 ft ỉ -X tert s ZZI z 4 V r I D I_I r f 5C r c I iz-x r6 nn I Robbyn Seller Geoff Wong Trish Greenhalgh Margaret Cargo Carol P Herbert Sarena D Seifer and Lawrence W Green7 Abstract Background Participatory Research PR entails the co-governance of research by academic researchers and endusers. End-users are those who are affected by issues under study . community groups or populations affected by illness or those positioned to act on the knowledge generated by research . clinicians community leaders health managers patients and policy makers . Systematic reviews assessing the generalizable benefits of PR must address the diversity of research topics methods and intervention designs that involve a PR approach varying degrees of end-user involvement in research co-governance both within and between projects and the complexity of outcomes arising from long-term partnerships. Methods We addressed the above mentioned challenges by adapting realist review methodology to PR assessment specifically by developing inductively-driven identification selection appraisal and synthesis procedures. This approach allowed us to address the non-uniformity and complexity of the PR literature. Each stage of the review involved two independent reviewers and followed a reproducible systematic coding and retention procedure. Retained studies were completed participatory health interventions demonstrated high levels of participation by non-academic stakeholders . excluding studies in which end-users were not involved in .
