Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài:Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women | Wathen et al. Implementation Science 2011 6 102 http content 6 1 102 Implementation Science IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE RESEARCH Open Access Talk trust and time a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women C Nadine Wathen 1 Shannon L Sibbald1 2 Susan M Jack3 and Harriet L MacMillan4 Abstract Background Violence against women VAW is a major public health problem. Translation of VAW research to policy and practice is an area that remains understudied but provides the opportunity to examine knowledge translation and exchange KTE processes in a complex multi-stakeholder context. In a series of studies including two randomized trials the McMaster University VAW Research Program studied one key research gap evidence about the effectiveness of screening women for exposure to intimate partner violence. This project developed and evaluated KTE strategies to share research findings with policymakers health and community service providers and women s advocates. Methods A longitudinal cross-sectional design applying concurrent mixed data collection methods surveys interviews and focus groups was used to evaluate the utility of specific KTE strategies including a series of workshops and a day-long Family Violence Knowledge Exchange Forum on research sharing uptake and use. Results Participants valued the opportunity to meet with researchers provide feedback on key messages and make personal connections with other stakeholders. A number of factors specific to the knowledge itself stakeholders contexts and the nature of the knowledge gap being addressed influenced the uptake sharing and use of the research. The types of knowledge use changed across time and were specifically related to both the types of decisions being made and to stage of decision making most reported use was conceptual or symbolic with few examples of instrumental use. Participants did report actively sharing the .
