Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Rethinking the conceptual terrain of AIDS scholarship: lessons from comparing 27 years of AIDS and climate change research | Globalization and Health BioMed Central Open Access Debate Rethinking the conceptual terrain of AIDS scholarship lessons from comparing 27 years of AIDS and climate change research May Chazan 1 2 Michael Brklacich1 and Alan Whiteside2 Address Department of Geography and Environmental Studies Carleton University Loeb B 349 Colonel By Drive Ottawa Canada and 2Health Economics and HIV AIDS Research Division University of KwaZulu-Natal Durban South Africa Email May Chazan - mchazan@ Michael Brklacich - michael_brklacich@ Alan Whiteside - whitesid@ Corresponding author Published 6 October 2009 Globalization and Health 2009 5 12 doi 1744-8603-5-12 Received 30 April 2009 Accepted 6 October 2009 This article is available from http content 5 1 12 2009 Chazan et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http licenses by which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background While there has recently been significant medical advance in understanding and treating HIV limitations in understanding the complex social dimensions of HIV AIDS epidemics continue to restrict a host of prevention and development efforts from community through to international levels. These gaps are rooted as much in limited conceptual development as they are in a lack of empirical research. Methods In this conceptual article the authors compare and contrast the evolution of climate change and AIDS research. They demonstrate how scholarship and response in these two seemingly disparate areas share certain important similarities such as the globalization of discourses and associated masking of uneven vulnerabilities the tendency toward techno-fixes and the polarization of debates within these fields. They also examine key divergences .
