Capitol Diện tích kiến trúc và Quy hoạch Hội đồng quản trị. Kiểm toán tài chính liên quan đến thời kỳ ngày 01 tháng 7 năm 1995, thông qua ngày 30 tháng sáu năm 1999 Tháng 9 năm 1999 Tài liệu này có thể được thực hiện trong các định dạng thay thế, chẳng hạn như in chữ lớn, chữ nổi Braille, hoặc băng âm thanh, bằng cách gọi 296-1727 Bộ phận Văn phòng Kiểm toán của Kiểm toán Nhà nước lập pháp của tiểu bang Minnesota. | Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board Financial-Related Audit For the Period July 1 1995 through June 30 1999 September 1999 This document can be made available in alternative formats such as large print Braille or audio tape by calling 296-1727 Financial Audit Division Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota 99-51 Centennial Office Building Saint Paul MN 55155 651 296-4708 SUMMARY State of Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor 1st Floor Centennial Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul MN 55155 651 296-1727 FAX 651 296-4712 TDD Relay 1-800-627-3529 email auditor@ URL http Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board Financial-Related Audit For the Period from July 1 1995 thrrough June 30 1999 Public Release Date September 30 1999 No. 99-51 Agency Background The Legislature created the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board in 1967. Its organization and purpose are defined in Minn. Stat. Section . In part the Legislature established the board to preserve and enhance the dignity beauty and architectural integrity of the capitol the buildings immediately adjacent to it the capitol grounds and the Capitol area. The board consists of ten members the Lieutenant Governor four members appointed by the Governor three members appointed by the Mayor of Saint Paul a state representative and a state senator. Audit Scope and Conclusions We have conducted a financial related audit of the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board for the period from July 1 1995 through June 30 1999. Our audit scope included general financial management including appropriations and payroll and professional technical services and per diem payments. We found that board expenditures were within the limits of its appropriations. The board administered its appropriations to ensure that expenditures complied with applicable legal requirements. However we found that the board miscoded certain transactions on the state s .
