Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về y học đề tài: Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT™) platform Ken Johnson1, Frederick Pearce2, Dwayne . | Available online http content 6 5 439 Research Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport LSTAT platform Ken Johnson1 Frederick Pearce2 Dwayne Westenskow3 L Lazarre Ogden1 Steven Farnsworth1 Shane Peterson4 Julia White4 and Travis Slade4 Assistant Professor Department of Anesthesiology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City USA 2Chief Department of Resuscitative Medicine UWH-A Division of Military Casualty Research Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Silver Spring MD USA 3Professor Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Anesthesiology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City USA 4Research Associate Department of Anesthesiology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City USA Correspondence Ken B Johnson kjohnson@ Received 10 October 2001 Revisions requested 22 November 2001 Revisions received 13 May 2002 Accepted 31 May 2002 Published 10 July 2002 Critical Care 2002 6 439-446 This article is online at http content 6 5 439 2002 Johnson et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd Print ISSN 1364-8535 Online ISSN 1466-609X Abstract Introduction The Life Support for Trauma and Transport LSTAT is a self-contained stretcher-based miniature intensive care unit designed by the United States Army to provide care for critically injured patients during transport and in remote settings where resources are limited. The LSTAT contains conventional medical equipment that has been integrated into one platform and reduced in size to fit within the dimensional envelope of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO stretcher. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the LSTAT in simulated and real clinical environments. Our hypothesis was that the LSTAT would be equivalent to conventional equipment in detecting and treating lifethreatening problems. Methods Thirty-one anesthesiologists and recovery room nurses compared the LSTAT with conventional monitors while managing four simulated .
