Ngoài ra còn có không có sự phản ánh về HIV / AIDS là có thể làm xói mòn năng lực khu vực công và những biện pháp được đưa đến địa chỉ này. Sự chú ý rõ ràng, tuy nhiên, sự cần thiết của pháp luật để bảo vệ các quyền của người sống chung với HIV / AIDS, bao gồm cả pháp luật về bảo vệ quyền lao động của họ. | frameworks. Clearly the assessment presented here is exploratory and tentative. The Poverty Eradication Action Plan PEAP 2001 Uganda s Poverty Eradication Action Plan PEAP was initially launched in 1997 and subsequently revised in 2001 as the national comprehensive development planning framework to guide sector plans district plans and the budget process. The PEAP also serves as Uganda s PRSP. The longterm goal of the PEAP is to reduce poverty to or less than 10 by the year 2017. It has four pillars Sustainable economic growth and structural transformation Good governance and security Increasing the ability of the poor to raise their incomes Improving the quality of life of the poor. The principles set out in the PEAP guide the formulation of the Sector Wide Approaches SWAps . The public expenditure implications of these SWAps are implemented through the budget under the Medium Term Expenditure Framework MTEF . SWAps are therefore the main vehicle to deliver the goals under the four pillars of the PEAP. The PEAP recognises HIV AIDS as a crosscutting issue in Uganda s development process. By virtue of its status as the principal development planning framework in the country it is implied that all sectors have to incorporate the response to HIV AIDS into their planning although no guidelines are offered on what is expected or how to do this. The PEAP further highlights the importance of the National Strategic Framework for HIV AIDS Activities in Uganda and the role of the UAC as the coordinating structure for the national response to HIV AIDS. However during the interviews quite a few respondents indicated that the reference to HIV AIDS as a crosscutting issue was mentioned in passing . Some even warned that this meant in practice that HIV AIDS tended to lose its prominence as a critical aspect of development planning. As one of the respondents said When AIDS was a specific programme it had prominence but when it shifted to a crosscutting issue it lost that .
