Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: "Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: Making feedback actionable"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: Making feedback actionable | Implementation Science BioMed Central Research article Open Access Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence Making feedback actionable Sylvia J Hysong 1 2 Richard G Best3 and Jacqueline A Pugh4 5 Address 1Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center Houston Texas USA 2Department of Medicine - Health Services Research Section Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA 3Healthcare Solutions Division Lockheed Martin Information Technology San Antonio Texas USA 4Veterans Evidence-Based Research Dissemination and Implementation Center South Texas Veterans Health Care System San Antonio Texas USA and 5Department of Medicine University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA Email Sylvia J Hysong - sylvia.hysong@med.va.gov Richard G Best - rbest@satx.rr.com Jacqueline A Pugh - pugh@uthscsa.edu Corresponding author Published 28 April 2006 Received 17 January 2006 Implementation Science 2006 1 9 doi 10.1186 1748-5908-1 -9 Accepted 28 April 2006 This article is available from http www.implementationscience.com content 1 1 9 2006 Hysong et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.Org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background As a strategy for improving clinical practice guideline CPG adherence audit and feedback A F has been found to be variably effective yet A F research has not investigated the impact of feedback characteristics on its effectiveness. This paper explores how high performing facilities HPF and low performing facilities LPF differ in the way they use clinical audit data for feedback purposes. Method Descriptive qualitative cross-sectional study of a purposeful sample of six Veterans Affairs Medical Centers VAMCs with high and low .