Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
FISCAL YEAR 2013 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES BUDGET OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT

Không đóng trình duyệt đến khi xuất hiện nút TẢI XUỐNG

Even thought most of the literature does not directly document this negative relationship there are several attempts to prove that discounting both complementary goods at the same time could be a protable strategy. Theoretical justication for holding sale on only one of two complements is grounded in the monopoly paradigm: if a shop lowers a price for one of the goods the optimal price for the other rises as the demand for it increases thus having both goods on sale should not be optimal. It is not obvious why, in the rst place, the monopolist has to lower one of the prices from its optimal monopoly level.

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

Federal Credit Supplement Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2013

The Department of Commerce Budget in Brief Fiscal Year 2013

General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2013 Revenue Proposals

Cuts, Consolidations, and savings Budget of the u.S. government FisCal year 2013

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2013

Office of Inspector General Work Plan 2013 FISCAL YEAR

PUBLIC BUDGET DATABASE USER’S GUIDE - Budget of the United States Government Fiscal Year 2013

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013

RDT&E PROGRAMS (R-1) Department of Defense Budget Fiscal Year 2013

CDC/ATSDR President’s Budget Request Fiscal Year 2013
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.