Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Ebook Marketing crime pay - Law and order: Part 2

(BQ) Part 2 book "Marketing crime pay - Law and order" has contents: Crime and punishment in american political culture, institutionalizing law and order, reconceptualizing the crime problem. | ^_ Crime and Punishment in American Political Culture the adoption antidrug cannot be primarily a response to popular sentiment, A lthoughunderstood asof tough anticrime andpublic havepoliciesquite it is true that some segments of the American been receptive to law and order rhetoric and proposals. This receptivity is not the inevitable consequence of an unchanging and monolithic political culture, but reflects the ability of the conservative discourse on crime to address social and personal troubles in a compelling manner. American Beliefs about Crime and Punishment According to conventional wisdom, Americans have little patience with liberal explanations of criminal behavior and wholeheartedly support tough responses to crime. While there is evidence that public opinion has shifted in this direction, popular attitudes regarding crime and punishment have historically been—and continue to be—more complex and ambiguous than this view allows. The belief that criminal offenders should be severely punished, for example, coexists with widespread support for policies aimed at rehabilitation.1 Many Americans continue to attribute crime to environmental and social conditions, a position typically associated with support for prevention and rehabilitation rather than punishment.2 In fact, when asked to choose 79 80 MAKING CRIME PAY between spending money on prisons and police, on the one hand, or education and job training on the other, two-thirds of those polled in the late 1980s chose the latter.3 Various perspectives on crime and punishment thus coexist in American political culture, even after decades of conservative political initiative on these issues. Arguments that depict law and order politics and policies as a direct manifestation of public attitudes oversimplify and dehistoricize American beliefs about crime and punishment. As Cullen and his colleagues conclude, "the structure of public attitudes is complex and could have supported progressive responses to