Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Đề thi thử THPT QG môn tiếng Anh năm 2019 - THPT Tôn Đức Thắng

Giúp học sinh đánh giá lại kiến thức đã học cũng như kinh nghiệm ra đề của giáo viên. Mời các bạn và quý thầy cô cùng tham khảo Đề thi thử THPT QG môn tiếng Anh năm 2019 - THPT Tôn Đức Thắng. | Đề thi thử THPT QG môn tiếng Anh năm 2019 - THPT Tôn Đức Thắng SỞ GIÁO DỤC ĐÀO TẠO PHÚ YÊN TRƯỜNG THPT TÔN ĐỨC THẮNG ĐỀ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT NĂM 2019 MÔN : ANH VĂN THỜI GIAN: 60 phút Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from36 to 42. Very few people, groups, or governments oppose globalization in its entirety. Instead, critics of globalization believe aspects of the way globalization operates should be changed. The debate over globalization is about what the best rules are for governing the global economy so that its advantages can grow while its problems can be solved. On one side of this debate are those who stress the benefits of removing barriers to international trade and investment, allowing capital to be allocated more efficiently and giving consumers greater freedom of choice. With free-market globalization, investment funds can move unimpeded from the rich countries to the developing countries. Consumers can benefit from cheaper products because reduced taxes make goods produced at low cost from faraway places cheaper to buy. Producers of goods gain by selling to a wider market. More competition keeps sellers on their toes and allows ideas and new technology to spread and benefit others. On the other side of the debate are critics who see neo-liberal policies as producing greater poverty, inequality, social conflict, cultural destruction, and environmental damage. They say that the most developed nations – the United States, Germany, and Japan – succeeded not because of free trade but because of protectionism and subsidies. They argue that the more recently successful economies of South Korea, Taiwan, and China all had strong state-led development strategies that did not follow neo-liberalism. These critics think that government encouragement of “infant industries” – that is, industries that are .