Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Conservative versus surgical management for patients with rotator cuff tears: A systematic review and META-analysis

Không đóng trình duyệt đến khi xuất hiện nút TẢI XUỐNG

This study aims to compare conservative versus surgical management for patients with full-thickness RC tear in terms of clinical and structural outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. At a 2-year follow-up, shoulder function evaluated in terms of CMS was not significantly improved. |

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

Operative versus conservative treatment of apophyseal avulsion fractures of the pelvis in the adolescents: A systematical review with meta-analysis of clinical outcome and return to sports

Rationale and design of the INNOVATE Trial: An international cooperative study on surgical versus conservative treatment for odontoid fractures in the elderly

Above-versus below-elbow casting for conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A randomized controlled trial and study protocol

Conservative versus surgical management for patients with rotator cuff tears: A systematic review and META-analysis

A protocol for a single-center, singleblinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years

Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures, a randomized controlled trial

Elbow valgus stability of the transverse bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.