Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Conventional versus helical blade screw insertion following the removal of the femoral head screw: A biomechanical evaluation using trochanteric gamma 3 locking nail versus PFN antirotation

Không đóng trình duyệt đến khi xuất hiện nút TẢI XUỐNG

When a hip screw needs to be changed, choosing between the conventional (C-type) and helical blade (H-type) types is difficult. In this biomechanical study, we compared these two screw types relative to the type of the initial screw used. |

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

Utility of BACTEC blood culture system versus conventional blood culture method for detection of bacteriaemia in pediatric patients

Fresh-cut produce: Comparison between sanitation and production methods organic versus conventional

Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparison of efficacy and safety

Conventional versus helical blade screw insertion following the removal of the femoral head screw: A biomechanical evaluation using trochanteric gamma 3 locking nail versus PFN antirotation

Physiotherapy plus conventional treatment versus conventional treatment only in the treatment of functional constipation in children: Design of a randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study in primary care

The VICI-trial: High frequency oscillation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: An international multicentre randomized controlled trial

Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Modifed high-fow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: A randomized clinical trial

A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted technique versus conventional puncture method for saphenous venous cannulations in children with congenital heart disease

Analgosedation during flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: Comparing the clinical effectiveness and safety of remifentanil versus midazolam/propofol
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.