Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: " Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches | Implementation Science BioMed Central Research article Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines CPGs comparing approaches Tari Turner 1 2 Marie Misso3 Claire Harris2 and Sally Green3 Open Access Address 1Centre for Clinical Effectiveness Southern Health Locked Bag 29 Clayton Victoria 3168 Australia 2Monash Institute of Health Services Research Monash University Locked Bag 29 Clayton Victoria 3168 Australia and 3Australasian Cochrane Centre Monash Institute of Health Services Research Monash University Locked Bag 29 Clayton Victoria 3168 Australia Email Tari Turner - tari.turner@med.monash.edu.au Marie Misso - marie.misso@med.monash.edu.au Claire Harris - claire.harris@med.monash.edu.au Sally Green - sally.green@med.monash.edu.au Corresponding author Published 27 October 2008 Received 19 February 2008 Implementation Science 2008 3 45 doi l0.ll86 l748-5908-3-45 Accepted 27 October 2008 This article is available from http www.implementationscience.com content 3 1 45 2008 Turner et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background While the potential of clinical practice guidelines CPGs to support implementation of evidence has been demonstrated it is not currently being achieved. CPGs are both poorly developed and ineffectively implemented. To improve clinical practice and health outcomes both well-developed CPGs and effective methods of CPG implementation are needed. We sought to establish whether there is agreement on the fundamental characteristics of an evidence-based CPG development process and to explore whether the level of guidance provided in CPG development handbooks is sufficient for people .