Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Observational studies - should we simply ignore them in assessing transfusion outcomes?

Không đóng trình duyệt đến khi xuất hiện nút TẢI XUỐNG

As defined by evidence-based medicine randomized controlled trials rank higher than observational studies in the hierarchy of clinical research. Accordingly, when assessing the effects of treatments on patient outcomes, there is a tendency to focus on the study method rather than also appraising the key elements of study design. |

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

Associations between aspirin use and the risk of cancers: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Coffee drinking and cancer risk: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies

Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: Why not just live together?

Observational studies - should we simply ignore them in assessing transfusion outcomes?

Physical activity and gestational weight gain: A systematic review of observational studies

The Egyptian clinical trials’ registry profile: Analysis of three trial registries (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry and clinicaltrials.gov)

Longterm follow-up in European respiratory health studies – patterns and implications

Ebook Designing clinical research (3/E): Part 1

báo cáo khoa học: "Influence of viral hepatitis status on prognosis in patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies"

Báo cáo y học: " Effects of cyclophosphamide on pulmonary function in patients with scleroderma and interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational prospective cohort studies"
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.