Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Environmental Management in Practice Part 11

Tham khảo tài liệu 'environmental management in practice part 11', kỹ thuật - công nghệ, cơ khí - chế tạo máy phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | Assessing the SMEs Competitive Strategies on the Impact of Environmental Factors A Quantitative Swot Analysis Application 291 Criteria 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Weights Strengths 4 8 4 2 0.264 Opportunities 7 4 7 0 0.299 Weaknesses 2 0 7 9 0.174 Threats 5 6 0 7 0.263 The weights are normalized and totally equal to one. Table 2. Priority votes of four criteria 3.3 Step 3 calculate the weights of criteria and sub- criteria in SWOT The votes on Table 2 are used to calculate the weights of the four criteria by model 2 R 4 S 4 n 18 and the lowest weights of the fourth place are -1- ur4 2 n S S 1 2 18 4 5 180 0.0056 . The weights for strength weakness opportunity and threat at the second level are 0.884 1.000 0.581 and 0.882 respectively. After normalizing these data the weights of outcome are 0.264 0.299 0.174 and 0.263 as it is illustrated in column 6 of Table 2 respectively. For Strengths in the Table 3 there are variables R 3 S 3 n 18 and the lowest weights of the third place are 1 108 ur3 2 n S S 1 2 18 3 4 0.0093 . Similarly the votes within Table 3 are using the same procedure in order to determine the weights of the sub-criteria. The results of the weight of sub-criteria are listed in columns 5 and 10 of Table 3. Criteria Votes 1st 2nd 3rd Weights Votes 1st 2nd 3rd Weights Strengths S1 13 4 1 0.465 Opportunities O1 15 2 1 0.495 S2 0 9 9 0.227 O2 0 15 3 0.258 S3 5 5 8 0.308 O3 3 1 14 0.247 Total 18 18 18 Total 18 18 18 Weaknesses Threats W1 11 7 0 0.439 T1 5 5 8 0.304 W2 3 3 12 0.258 T2 5 9 4 0.336 W3 4 8 6 0.303 T3 8 4 6 0.360 Total 18 18 18 Total 18 18 18 The weights are normalized and totally equal to one. Table 3. Priority votes and weights of twelve sub-criteria 3.4 Step 4 scores of competitive strategies in SWOT The competitive strategies OS-1 OS-2 OW-1 TS-1 and TW-1 are subjective indices that could be translated into numerical ratings using different methods such as questionnaire AHP or vote-ranking and so much more. TF may ask their colleagues to answer these .