Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: " Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect | Implementation Science BioMed Central Research article Open Access Recruiting medical groups for research relationships reputation requirements rewards reciprocity resolution and respect Leif I Solberg Address Healthpartners Research Foundation PO Box 1524 MS 21111R Minneapolis MN 55440-1524 USA Email Leif I Solberg - Leif.I.Solberg@HealthPartners.com Corresponding author Published 26 October 2006 Implementation Science 2006 1 25 doi 10.1186 1748-5908-1-25 Received 08 June 2006 Accepted 26 October 2006 This article is available from http www.implementationscience.cOm content 1 1 25 2006 Solberg licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background In order to conduct good implementation science research it will be necessary to recruit and obtain good cooperation and comprehensive information from complete medical practice organizations. The goal of this paper is to report an effective example of such a recruitment effort for a study of the organizational aspects of depression care quality. Methods There were 41 medical groups in the Minnesota region that were eligible for participation in the study because they had sufficient numbers of patients with depression. We documented the steps required to both recruit their participation in this study and obtain their completion of two questionnaire surveys and two telephone interviews. Results All 41 medical groups agreed to participate and consented to our use of confidential data about their care quality. In addition all 82 medical directors and quality improvement coordinators completed the necessary questionnaires and interviews. The key factors explaining this success can be summarized as the seven R s Relationships Reputation Requirements Rewards Reciprocity .