Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: "A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II | Brouwers et al. Implementation Science 2010 5 29 http www.implementationscience.eom content 5 1 29 IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE Implementation Science STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Arandomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner s performance satisfaction and self-efficacy with the AGREE II Melissa C Brouwers 1 Julie Makarski2 and Anthony J Levinson3 Abstract Background Practice guidelines PGs are systematically developed statements intended to assist in patient practitioner and policy decisions. The AGREE II is the revised and updated standard tool for guideline development reporting and evaluation. It is comprised of 23 items and a user s Manual. The AGREE II is ready for use. Objectives To develop execute and evaluate the impact of two internet-based educational interventions designed to accelerate the capacity of stakeholders to use the AGREE II a multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach and a higher intensity training program including both the didactic tutorial and an interactive practice exercise component. Methods Participants clinicians developers and policy makers will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Condition one didactic tutorial -- participants will go through the on-line AGREE II tutorial supported by a virtual coach and review of the AGREE II prior to appraising the test PG. Condition two tutorial practice-- following the multimedia didactic tutorial with a virtual coach participants will review the on-line AGREE II independently and use it to appraise a practice PG. Upon entering their AGREE II score for the practice PG participants will be given immediate feedback on how their score compares to expert norms. If their score falls outside a predefined range the participant will receive a series of hints to guide the appraisal process. Participants will receive an overall summary of their performance appraising the PG compared to expert norms. Condition three control arm -- participants will receive