Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: "E-learning interventions are comparable to user’s manual in a randomized trial of training strategies for the AGREE II"

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: E-learning interventions are comparable to user’s manual in a randomized trial of training strategies for the AGREE II | Brouwers et al. Implementation Science 2011 6 81 http www.implementationscience.eom content 6 1 81 Implementation Science IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE RESEARCH Open Access E-learning interventions are comparable to user s manual in a randomized trial of training strategies for the AGREE II Melissa C Brouwers1 2 Julie Makarski1 Lisa D Durocher1 and Anthony J Levinson3 Abstract Background Practice guidelines PGs are systematically developed statements intended to assist in patient and practitioner decisions. The AGREE II is the revised tool for PG development reporting and evaluation comprised of 23 items two global rating scores and a new User s Manual. In this study we sought to develop execute and evaluate the impact of two internet interventions designed to accelerate the capacity of stakeholders to use the AGREE II. Methods Participants were randomized to one of three training conditions. Tutorial participants proceeded through the online tutorial with a virtual coach and reviewed a PDF copy of the AGREE II. Tutorial Practice Exercise -in addition to the Tutorial participants also appraised a practice PG. For the practice PG appraisal participants received feedback on how their scores compared to expert norms and formative feedback if scores fell outside the predefined range. AGREE II User s Manual PDF control condition -participants reviewed a PDF copy of the AGREE II only. All participants evaluated a test PG using the AGREE II. Outcomes of interest were learners performance satisfaction self-efficacy mental effort time-on-task and perceptions of AGREE II. Results No differences emerged between training conditions on any of the outcome measures. Conclusions We believe these results can be explained by better than anticipated performance of the AGREE II PDF materials control condition or the participants level of health methodology and PG experience rather than the failure of the online training interventions. Some data suggest the online tools may be useful for .